- Video editing software 2018 reviews movie#
- Video editing software 2018 reviews Offline#
- Video editing software 2018 reviews professional#
- Video editing software 2018 reviews series#
The interface, while accounting for both "traditional" editing styles and the "modern" style of treating the timeline as a sort of scratchpad, wouldn't really satisfy an editor who wants to cut by numbers.Gaining flexibility means you gain the responsibility for maintaining a sensible media library.
Video editing software 2018 reviews series#
Don't throw in an animated GIF without first breaking it out into a series of images. Instead of using an MP3, convert the MP3 to WAV first (which is what other editors do for you, but they do it "behind the scenes"). You should resist the urge to take advantage of this flexibility and instead manage your assets and formats smartly. The greatest weakness of open source editing is also its greatest strengths: Kdenlive lets you throw nearly anything you want at it, even if that sometimes means its performance suffers.
Video editing software 2018 reviews Offline#
It can do some advanced visual effects, like masking, all manner of composting (see this, this, and this), color correction, offline "proxy" editing, and much much more.
Kdenlive has plenty of capabilities beyond just cutting up footage. 
The way you work in Kdenlive is natural and flexible, allowing you to use both of the major styles of editing: cutting by numbers and just mousing around in the timeline. The interface is intuitive for anyone who has ever used a professional-style editing application. As long as you run a stable version of Kdenlive on a stable Linux OS, use reasonable file formats, and keep your work organized, you'll have a reliable, professional-quality editing experience. Video editing software 2018 reviews professional#
Kdenlive is the best-in-class professional open source editing application, hands-down. A professional editor might get their footage from a producer or director, and when they're done they probably aren't exporting the final version that their audiences are going to see, but they'll pass their work on to audio engineers, VFX artists, and colorists.
Professional integration: A "professional" editor probably also uses only one application to edit video, but that's because they're a cog in a larger machine. Independent: For the purposes of this article, I'll call a workflow that begins and ends with either one video editing software or one computer system either "independent" or "hobbyist." In other words, an independent or hobbyist filmmaker is likely to use one application to do video editing, maybe a few other applications for specialized tasks like audio sweetening or motion graphics, and then they're done. It's not unlike the debate over professional SLR cameras that happened when digital cameras in phones became contenders for serious photography.įor this reason, a pragmatic overview of a Linux-based video editor needs two broad qualifiers: How it performs for home users, and how it might integrate into a professional pipeline. For instance, to some people a video editing application must be able to generate fancy animated title sequences, while professional users balk at the idea of doing serious work on titles in their video editor. It can be difficult to talk about video editing objectively because it means so many different things to different people. Slowly, however, as artists seek to simplify and consolidate the post-production pipeline, Linux video editing is gaining in popularity. Linux is the standard base, a literal industry standard for digital effects but, like all technology with momentum, it seems that the process of cutting footage still defaults mostly to a non-Linux platform. Video editing software 2018 reviews movie#
It's pretty well known that Linux is a big deal in modern movie making.
0 kommentar(er)
